Omission impossible

Philosophical Studies 173 (10):2575-2589 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This paper gives a framework for understanding causal counterpossibles, counterfactuals imbued with causal content whose antecedents appeal to metaphysically impossible worlds. Such statements are generated by omissive causal claims that appeal to metaphysically impossible events, such as “If the mathematician had not failed to prove that 2+2=5, the math textbooks would not have remained intact.” After providing an account of impossible omissions, the paper argues for three claims: (i) impossible omissions play a causal role in the actual world, (ii) causal counterpossibles have broad applications in philosophy, and (iii) the truth of causal counterpossibles provides evidence for the nonvacuity of counterpossibles more generally.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2014-07-09
Latest version: 8 (2016-05-04)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Overdetermination Underdetermined.Sara Bernstein - 2016 - Erkenntnis 81 (1):17-40.
Williamson on Counterpossibles.Berto Francesco, David Ripley, Graham Priest & Rohan French - 2018 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 47 (4):693-713.
Grounding Is Not Causation.Sara Bernstein - 2016 - Philosophical Perspectives 30 (1):21-38.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
401 ( #5,878 of 37,288 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #13,210 of 37,288 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.