Omission impossible

Philosophical Studies 173 (10):2575-2589 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This paper gives a framework for understanding causal counterpossibles, counterfactuals imbued with causal content whose antecedents appeal to metaphysically impossible worlds. Such statements are generated by omissive causal claims that appeal to metaphysically impossible events, such as “If the mathematician had not failed to prove that 2+2=5, the math textbooks would not have remained intact.” After providing an account of impossible omissions, the paper argues for three claims: (i) impossible omissions play a causal role in the actual world, (ii) causal counterpossibles have broad applications in philosophy, and (iii) the truth of causal counterpossibles provides evidence for the nonvacuity of counterpossibles more generally.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2014-07-09
Latest version: 8 (2016-05-04)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
731 ( #7,759 of 64,219 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
33 ( #22,685 of 64,219 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.