Two Problems for Proportionality about Omissions

Dialectica 68 (3):429-441 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Theories of causation grounded in counterfactual dependence face the problem of profligate omissions: numerous irrelevant omissions count as causes of an outcome. A recent purported solution to this problem is proportionality, which selects one omission among many candidates as the cause of an outcome. This paper argues that proportionality cannot solve the problem of profligate omissions for two reasons. First: the determinate/determinable relationship that holds between properties like aqua and blue does not hold between negative properties like not aqua and not blue. Negative properties are those at stake in omissive causation. Second: proportionality misconstrues the nature of the problem to be solved
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BERTPF
Revision history
First archival date: 2014-06-11
Latest version: 2 (2014-06-15)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Mental Causation.Yablo, Stephen
Fundamental Determinables.Wilson, Jessica M.
Against Proportionality.Shapiro, L. & Sober, E.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2014-06-11

Total views
231 ( #13,479 of 40,598 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
58 ( #9,408 of 40,598 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.