Why Christians Should Not Be Kaneans about Freedom

Philosophia Christi 19 (2):315 - 329 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Abstract: In this paper we argue that Robert Kane’s theory of free will cannot accommodate the possibility of a sinless individual who faces morally significant choices because a sinless agent cannot voluntarily accord value to an immoral desire, and we argue that Kane’s theory requires this. Since the Jesus of the historic Christian tradition is held to be sinless, we think Christians should reject Kane’s theory because it seems irreconcilable with historic Christian Christology. We consider two objections to our argument and argue that both fail.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BERWCS
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-05-11
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-11-08

Total views
139 ( #28,381 of 51,726 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #25,987 of 51,726 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.