Political liberalism, the internal conception, and the problem of public dogma

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
According to the “internal” conception (Quong), political liberalism aims to be publicly justifiable only to people who are reasonable in a special sense specified and advocated by political liberalism itself. One advantage of the internal conception allegedly is that it enables liberalism to avoid perfectionism. The paper takes issue with this view. It argues that once the internal conception is duly pitched at its fundamental, metatheoretical level and placed in its proper discursive context, it emerges that it comes at the cost of public dogma. The paper examines this problem and argues that a plausible response to this problem is to go beyond the internal conception and adopt a more inclusive, dynamic conception. But this calls for a form of perfectionism. Thus, the internal conception of political liberalism, far from showing how liberalism can be had without perfectionism, effectively calls for perfectionism as a remedy for its problems.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BESPLT
Revision history
First archival date: 2012-09-04
Latest version: 7 (2013-02-05)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
On Robust Discursive Equality.Thomas M. Besch - 2019 - Dialogue 58 (3):1-26.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2012-09-04

Total views
330 ( #10,634 of 43,686 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #24,322 of 43,686 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.