Humean Nomic Essentialism

Noûs (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Humeanism -- the idea that there are no necessary connections between distinct existences -- and Nomic Essentialism -- the idea that properties essentially play the nomic roles that they do -- are two of the most important and influential positions in the metaphysics of science. Traditionally, it has been thought that these positions were incompatible competitors. We disagree. We argue that there is an attractive version of Humeanism that captures the idea that, for example, mass essentially plays the role that it actually does in the laws of nature. In this paper we consider the arguments that have lead many to conclude that Humeanism cannot be combined with Nomic Essentialism; we identify the weaknesses in these arguments; and we argue in detail that a version of Humeanism based on a variant of the Best System account of laws captures the key intuitions behind nomic essentialism.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BHOHNE
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-07-28
View other versions
Added to PP index
2021-07-28

Total views
154 ( #36,825 of 64,193 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
154 ( #3,470 of 64,193 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.