Reference and causal chains

In Language and reality from a naturalistic perspective: Themes from Michael Devitt. Cham: Springer. pp. 121-136 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Around 1970, both Keith Donnellan and Saul Kripke produced powerful arguments against description theories of proper names. They also offered sketches of positive accounts of proper name reference, highlighting the crucial role played by historical facts that might be unknown to the speaker. Building on these sketches, in the following years Michael Devitt elaborated his well-known causal theory of proper names. As I have argued elsewhere, however, contrary to what is commonly assumed, Donnellan’s and Kripke’s sketches point in two rather different directions, by appealing to historical or causal facts of different sorts. In this paper, I shall discuss and criticize Devitt’s causal theory, which confuses things, I shall argue, by mixing, so to speak, Donnellan’s and Kripke’s sketches.

Author Profiles

Andrea Bianchi
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (PhD)
Andrea Bianchi
University of Parma

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-10-31

Downloads
412 (#55,492)

6 months
95 (#59,197)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?