Hobbes on the Order of Sciences: A Partial Defense of the Mathematization Thesis

Southern Journal of Philosophy 54 (3):312-332 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Accounts of Hobbes’s ‘system’ of sciences oscillate between two extremes. On one extreme, the system is portrayed as wholly axiomtic-deductive, with statecraft being deduced in an unbroken chain from the principles of logic and first philosophy. On the other, it is portrayed as rife with conceptual cracks and fissures, with Hobbes’s statements about its deductive structure amounting to mere window-dressing. This paper argues that a middle way is found by conceiving of Hobbes’s _Elements of Philosophy_ on the model of a mixed-mathematical science, not the model provided by Euclid’s _Elements of Geometry_. I suggest that Hobbes is a test case for understanding early-modern system-construction more generally, as inspired by the structure of the applied mathematical sciences. This approach has the additional virtue of bolstering, in a novel way, the thesis that the transformation of philosophy in the long seventeenth century was heavily indebted to mathematics, a thesis that has increasingly come under attack in recent years.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-01-20
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Spinoza on Extension.Peterman, Alison
Aristotle on Meaning and Essence.Butler, Travis & Charles, David

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
119 ( #20,406 of 38,927 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #31,163 of 38,927 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.