Can my religion influence my conception of justice? Political liberalism and the role of comprehensive doctrines

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In his last works, John Rawls explicitly argued for an overlapping consensus on a family of reasonable liberal political conceptions of justice, rather than just one. This ‘Deep Version’ of political liberalism opens up new questions about the relationship between citizens’ political conceptions, from which they must draw and offer public reasons in their political advocacy, and their comprehensive doctrines. These questions centre on whether a reasonable citizen’s choice of political conception can be influenced by her comprehensive doctrine. In this paper I present two models of the relationship, which give contrasting answers to these questions, and defend the model that is more permissive with regard to the influence of comprehensive doctrines. This has important implications for our understanding of Rawlsian political liberalism, and reduces the force of objections that have been offered by theorists sympathetic to religion.
Reprint years
2017
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BILCMR
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-08-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-08-21

Total views
359 ( #11,968 of 48,970 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
67 ( #9,105 of 48,970 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.