Does political community require public reason? On Lister’s defence of political liberalism

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Andrew Lister’s Public Reason and Political Community is an important new contribution to the debate over political liberalism. In this article, I critically evaluate some of the central arguments of the book in order to assess the current state of public reason liberalism. I pursue two main objections to Lister’s work. First, Lister’s justification for public reason, which appeals to the value of civic friendship, fails to show why public reason liberalism should be preferred to an alternative democratic theory that does not include public reason restrictions. Second, there are several important ambiguities and tensions within Lister’s view that he does not adequately resolve. His approach to them often takes public reason liberalism in directions that many of its advocates will reject. More work thus remains to be done by public reason liberals both to show why public reason restrictions are necessary and to resolve these tensions in a more satisfactory way
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BILDPC
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-12-02
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-03-11

Total views
134 ( #20,763 of 40,634 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
31 ( #18,631 of 40,634 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.