Free Will and the Cross-Level Consequence Argument

Abstract

Christian List has recently constructed a novel formal framework for representing the relationship between free will and determinism. At its core is a distinction between physical and agential levels of description. List has argued that, since the consequence argument cannot be reconstructed within this framework, the consequence argument rests on a ‘category mistake’: an illicit conflation of the physical and agential levels. I show that an expanded version of List’s framework allows the construction of a cross-level consequence argument.

Author's Profile

Jonathan Birch
London School of Economics

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-17

Downloads
549 (#41,071)

6 months
100 (#54,930)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?