An Epistemological Role for Thought Experiments

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Why should a thought experiment, an experiment that only exists in people's minds, alter our fundamental beliefs about reality? After all, isn't reasoning from the imaginary to the real a sign of psychosis? A historical survey of how thought experiments have shaped our physical laws might lead one to believe that it's not the case that the laws of physics lie - it's that they don't even pretend to tell the truth. My aim in this paper is to defend an account of thought experiments that fits smoothly into our understanding of the historical trajectory of actual thought experiments and that explains how any rational person could allow an imagined, unrealized (or unrealizable) situation to change their conception of the universe.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BISAER
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-09-12
View other versions
Added to PP index
2014-03-27

Total views
118 ( #43,632 of 65,545 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #37,844 of 65,545 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.