Why Thought Experiments are Not Arguments

Philosophy of Science 66 (4):534-541 (1999)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Are thought experiments nothing but arguments? I argue that it is not possible to make sense of the historical trajectory of certain thought experiments if one takes them to be arguments. Einstein and Bohr disagreed about the outcome of the clock-in-the-box thought experiment, and so they reconstructed it using different arguments. This is to be expected whenever scientists disagree about a thought experiment's outcome. Since any such episode consists of two arguments but just one thought experiment, the thought experiment cannot be the arguments.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BISWTE
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-09-12
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
305 ( #22,770 of 65,629 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #32,112 of 65,629 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.