Conditionals as attitude reports

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Most theories of conditionals and attitudes do not analyze either phenomenon in terms of the other. A few view attitude reports as a species of conditionals (e.g. Stalnaker 1984, Heim 1992). Based on evidence from Kalaallisut, this paper argues for the opposite thesis: conditionals are a species of attitude reports. The argument builds on prior findings that conditionals are modal topic-comment structures (e.g. Haiman 1978, Bittner 2001), and that in mood-based Kalaallisut English future (e.g. Ole will win) translates into a factual report of a prospect-oriented attitudinal state (e.g. expectation or anxiety, see Bittner 2005). It is argued that in conditionals the antecedent introduces a topical subdomain of an input modal base (Kratzer 1981) and requires the consequent to comment. The comment is a factual report of an attitude to the topical antecedent sub-domain. [This paper was published in 2011 as "Time and modality without tenses or modals"]
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BITCAA
Upload history
First archival date: 2012-10-12
Latest version: 3 (2013-10-11)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2010-01-09

Total views
603 ( #6,465 of 51,439 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #24,789 of 51,439 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.