The Structural Determination of Case and Agreement

Linguistic Inquiry 27 (1):1–68 (1996)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
We analyze Case in terms of independent constraints on syntactic structures — namely, the Projection Principle (inherent Case), the ECP (marked structural Case), and the theory of extended projections (the nominative, a Caseless nominal projection). The resulting theory accounts for (1) the government constraint on Case assignment, (2) all major Case systems (accusative, ergative, active, three-way, and split), (3) Case alternations (passive, antipassive, and ECM), and (4) the Case of nominal possessors. Structural Case may correlate with pronominal agreement because the former can, and the latter must, involve antecedent-government by a functional head. However, neither phenomenon implies the other.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BITTSD
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-10-02
View other versions
Added to PP index
2010-12-22

Total views
347 ( #13,163 of 51,719 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #25,987 of 51,719 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.