Granularity problems

Philosophical Quarterly 67 (266):22-37 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Possible-worlds accounts of mental or linguistic content are often criticized for being too coarse-grained. To make room for more fine-grained distinctions among contents, several authors have recently proposed extending the space of possible worlds by "impossible worlds". We argue that this strategy comes with serious costs: we would effectively have to abandon most of the features that make the possible-worlds framework attractive. More generally, we argue that while there are intuitive and theoretical considerations against overly coarse-grained notions of content, the same kinds of considerations also prohibit an overly fine-grained individuation of content. An adequate notion of content, it seems, should have intermediate granularity. However, it is hard to construe a notion of content that meets these demands. Any notion of content, we suggest, must be either implausibly coarse-grained or implausibly fine-grained (or both).
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-03-16
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
354 ( #16,479 of 2,428,027 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
39 ( #20,060 of 2,428,027 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.