Moral Attitudes for Non-Cognitivists: Solving the Specification Problem

Mind 123 (489):1-38 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Moral non-cognitivists hope to explain the nature of moral agreement and disagreement as agreement and disagreement in non-cognitive attitudes. In doing so, they take on the task of identifying the relevant attitudes, distinguishing the non-cognitive attitudes corresponding to judgements of moral wrongness, for example, from attitudes involved in aesthetic disapproval or the sports fan’s disapproval of her team’s performance. We begin this paper by showing that there is a simple recipe for generating apparent counterexamples to any informative specification of the moral attitudes. This may appear to be a lethal objection to non-cognitivism, but a similar recipe challenges attempts by non-cognitivism’s competitors to specify the conditions underwriting the contrast between genuine and merely apparent moral disagreement. Because of its generality, this specification problem requires a systematic response, which, we argue, is most easily available for the non-cognitivist. Building on premisses congenial to the non-cognitivist tradition, we make the following claims: (1) In paradigmatic cases, wrongness-judgements constitute a certain complex but functionally unified state, and paradigmatic wrongness-judgements form a functional kind, preserved by homeostatic mechanisms. (2) Because of the practical function of such judgements, we should expect judges’ intuitive understanding of agreement and disagreement to be accommodating, treating states departing from the paradigm in various ways as wrongness-judgements. (3) This explains the intuitive judgements required by the counterexample-generating recipe, and more generally why various kinds of amoralists are seen as making genuine wrongness-judgements
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BJRMAF
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-04-06
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
.Shafer-Landau, Russ (ed.)

View all 75 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Motivational Internalism and Folk Intuitions.Björnsson, Gunnar; Eriksson, John; Strandberg, Caj; Olinder, Ragnar Francén & Björklund, Fredrik
Ethical Judgment and Motivation.Faraci, David & McPherson, Tristram

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-01-28

Total views
700 ( #4,614 of 47,267 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
118 ( #4,687 of 47,267 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.