Review of Rik Peels' Responsible Belief: A Theory in Ethics and Epistemology [Book Review]

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this book, Rik Peels provides a comprehensive original account of intellectual duties, doxastic blameworthiness, and responsible belief. The discussions, relating to work in epistemology as well as moral responsibility, are clear and often provide useful entries into the literature. Though I disagree with some of the main conclusions, the arguments are carefully laid out and typically merit a good amount of thought even where one remains unconvinced. After providing an overview of the contents, I specifically suggest that Peels theory fails to account for one important kind of doxastic obligations and doxastic blame.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BJRROR
Revision history
First archival date: 2017-10-18
Latest version: 2 (2017-10-19)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Explaining Away Epistemic Skepticism About Culpability.Gunnar Björnsson - 2017 - In Shoemaker David (ed.), Oxford Studies in Agency and Responsibility. Oxford University Press. pp. 141–164.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-10-18

Total views
89 ( #32,998 of 47,256 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #36,563 of 47,256 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.