Knowledge and the Fall in American Neo-Calvinism: Towards a Van Til–Plantinga Synthesis

Philosophia Reformata 87 (1) (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Cornelius Van Til and Alvin Plantinga represent two strands of American Protestant philosophical thought influenced by Dutch Neo-Calvinism. This paper compares and synthetizes their models of knowledge in non-Christians given the noetic effects of sin and non-Christian worldview commitments. The paper argues that Van Til’s distinction between the partial realization of the antithesis in practice and its absolute nature in principle correlates with Plantinga’s insistence on prima facie warranted common sense beliefs and their ultimate defeasibility given certain metaphysical commitments. Van Til endorsed more radical claims than Plantinga on epistemic defeat in nonChristian worldviews, the status of the sensus divinitatis , and conceptual accuracy in knowledge of the world. Finally an approach to the use of evidence in apologetics is developed based on this proposed synthesis. This approach seeks to make more place for evidence than is generally recognized in Van Tilianism while remaining consistent with the founder’s principles.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BKEKAT
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-07-15
View other versions
Added to PP index
2021-07-15

Total views
41 ( #55,155 of 2,439,391 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
41 ( #17,282 of 2,439,391 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.