Knowledge and implicatures

Synthese 190 (18):4293-4319 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In recent work on the semantics of ‘knowledge’-attributions, a variety of accounts have been proposed that aim to explain the data about speaker intuitions in familiar cases such as DeRose’s Bank Case or Cohen’s Airport Case by means of pragmatic mechanisms, notably Gricean implicatures. This paper argues that pragmatic explanations of the data regarding ‘knowledge’-attributions are unsuccessful and concludes that in explaining those data we have to resort to accounts that (a) take those data at their semantic face value (Epistemic Contextualism, Subject-Sensitive Invariantism or Epistemic Relativism), or (b) reject them on psychological grounds (Moderate Insensitive Invariantism). To establish this conclusion, the paper relies solely upon widely accepted assumptions about pragmatic theory, broadly construed, and on the Stalnakerian insight that linguistic communication takes place against the backdrop of a set of mutually accepted propositions: a conversation’s common ground.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-08-14
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Relevance: Communication and Cognition.Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre
Knowledge in an Uncertain World.Fantl, Jeremy & McGrath, Matthew

View all 68 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Much at Stake in Knowledge.Dinges, Alexander & Zakkou, Julia
Innocent Implicatures.Dinges, Alexander
Revisionary Epistemology.Fassio, Davide & McKenna, Robin

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
316 ( #14,263 of 50,504 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
40 ( #15,026 of 50,504 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.