Interpreting Images

In Resemblance and Representation. Open Book Publishers. pp. 118-138 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Just as it’s possible to understand novel sentences without having heard them before, it’s possible to understand novel pictures without having seen them before. But these possibilities are often supposed to have totally different explanations: whereas the ability to understand novel sentences is supposed to be explained by tacit knowledge of a compositional theory of meaning for their language, the ability to understand novel pictures is supposed to be explained differently. In this paper I argue against this disanalogy: insofar as the ability to understand novel sentences is explained by tacit knowledge of a compositional theory, I argue, so is the ability to understand novel pictures.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BLUDAC-3
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-06-29
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-02-13

Total views
176 ( #14,490 of 37,268 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #30,338 of 37,268 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.