Depiction and Composition

In Resemblance and Representation. Open Book Publishers. pp. 99-116 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Traditionally, the structure of a language is revealed by constructing an appropriate theory of meaning for that language, which exhibits how – and whether – the meaning of sentences in the language depends upon the meaning of their parts. In this paper, I argue that whether – and how – what pictures represent depends on what their parts represent should likewise by revealed by the construction of appropriate theories of representation for the symbol system of those pictures. This generalisation, I argue, reveals a much cited disanalogy between depiction and description is illusory: the structure of pictures, like language, is compositional.
Keywords
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BLUDAC-4
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-06-29
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology.Armstrong, D. M. & Lewis, David

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2012-01-10

Total views
207 ( #14,992 of 40,750 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
48 ( #12,072 of 40,750 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.