Distance and Dissimilarity
Philosophical Papers:1-29 (forthcoming)
Abstract
This paper considers whether an analogy between distance and dissimilarlity supports the thesis that degree of dissimilarity is distance in a metric space. A straightforward way to justify the thesis would be to define degree of dissimilarity as a function of number of properties in common and not in common. But, infamously, this approach has problems with infinity. An alternative approach would be to prove representation and uniqueness theorems, according to which if comparative dissimilarity meets certain qualitative conditions, then it is representable by distance in a metric space. I will argue that this approach faces equally severe problems with infinity.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BLUDAD
Revision history

Features of Similarity.Tversky, Amos
Counterfactuals.Lewis, D.
It Simply Does Not Add Up: Trouble with Overall Similarity.Morreau, Michael
View all 12 references / Add more references

No citations found.
Added to PP index
2016-06-17
Total downloads
74 ( #24,496 of 37,184 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #17,760 of 37,184 )
2016-06-17
Total downloads
74 ( #24,496 of 37,184 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #17,760 of 37,184 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.