Ignorance Implicatures and Non-doxastic Attitude Verbs

Proceedings of the 21st Amsterdam Colloquium (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper is about conjunctions and disjunctions in the scope of non-doxastic atti- tude verbs. These constructions generate a certain type of ignorance implicature. I argue that the best way to account for these implicatures is by appealing to a notion of contex- tual redundancy (Schlenker, 2008; Fox, 2008; Mayr and Romoli, 2016). This pragmatic approach to ignorance implicatures is contrasted with a semantic account of disjunctions under `wonder' that appeals to exhausti cation (Roelofsen and Uegaki, 2016). I argue that exhausti cation-based theories cannot handle embedded conjunctions, so a pragmatic account of ignorance implicatures is superior.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BLUIIA-5
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-12-09
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-12-09

Total views
97 ( #33,645 of 50,123 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #29,851 of 50,123 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.