Ignorance Implicatures and Non-doxastic Attitude Verbs

Proceedings of the 21st Amsterdam Colloquium (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper is about conjunctions and disjunctions in the scope of non-doxastic atti- tude verbs. These constructions generate a certain type of ignorance implicature. I argue that the best way to account for these implicatures is by appealing to a notion of contex- tual redundancy (Schlenker, 2008; Fox, 2008; Mayr and Romoli, 2016). This pragmatic approach to ignorance implicatures is contrasted with a semantic account of disjunctions under `wonder' that appeals to exhausti cation (Roelofsen and Uegaki, 2016). I argue that exhausti cation-based theories cannot handle embedded conjunctions, so a pragmatic account of ignorance implicatures is superior.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BLUIIA-5
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-12-09
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-12-09

Total views
118 ( #35,255 of 56,100 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #35,261 of 56,100 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.