Ignorance Implicatures and Non-doxastic Attitude Verbs

Proceedings of the 21st Amsterdam Colloquium (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper is about conjunctions and disjunctions in the scope of non-doxastic atti- tude verbs. These constructions generate a certain type of ignorance implicature. I argue that the best way to account for these implicatures is by appealing to a notion of contex- tual redundancy (Schlenker, 2008; Fox, 2008; Mayr and Romoli, 2016). This pragmatic approach to ignorance implicatures is contrasted with a semantic account of disjunctions under `wonder' that appeals to exhausti cation (Roelofsen and Uegaki, 2016). I argue that exhausti cation-based theories cannot handle embedded conjunctions, so a pragmatic account of ignorance implicatures is superior.

Author's Profile

Kyle H. Blumberg
Australian Catholic University

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-09

Downloads
238 (#34,118)

6 months
32 (#31,905)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?