Pictures and Properties

In Resemblance and Representation. Open Book Publishers. pp. 179-198 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
It’s a platitude that a picture is realistic to the degree to which it resembles what it represents (in relevant respects). But if properties are abundant and degrees of resemblance are proportions of properties in common, then the degree of resemblance between different particulars is constant (or undefined), which is inconsonant with the platitude. This paper argues this problem should be resolved by revising the analysis of degrees of resemblance in terms of proportion of properties in common, and not by accepting a sparse theory of properties or by denying that degree of realism is degree of resemblance (in relevant respects).
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BLUPAP-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-06-29
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2012-08-09

Total views
168 ( #15,068 of 37,262 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #27,703 of 37,262 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.