Demonstration and the Indemonstrability of the Stoic Indemonstrables

Phronesis 65 (3):355-378 (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Since Mates’ seminal Stoic Logic there has been uncertainty and debate about how to treat the term anapodeiktos when used of Stoic syllogisms. This paper argues that the customary translation of anapodeiktos by ‘indemonstrable’ is accurate, and it explains why this is so. At the heart of the explanation is an argument that, contrary to what is commonly assumed, indemonstrability is rooted in the generic account of the Stoic epistemic notion of demonstration. Some minor insights into Stoic logic ensue.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BOBDAT-2
Upload history
First archival date: 2019-12-21
Latest version: 2 (2019-12-23)
View other versions
Added to PP
2019-12-21

Downloads
299 (#26,993)

6 months
71 (#10,467)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?