Dilemma for appeals to the moral significance of birth

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Giubilini and Minerva argue that the permissibility of abortion entails the permissibility of infanticide. Proponents of what we refer to as the Birth Strategy claim that there is a morally significant difference brought about at birth that accounts for our strong intuition that killing newborns is morally impermissible. We argue that strategy does not account for the moral intuition that late-term, non-therapeutic abortions are morally impermissible. Advocates of the Birth Strategy must either judge non-therapeutic abortions as impermissible in the later stages of pregnancy or conclude that they are permissible on the basis of premises that are far less intuitively plausible than the opposite conclusion and its supporting premises.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years
2020, 2021
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BOBDFA
Upload history
First archival date: 2020-10-28
Latest version: 2 (2020-10-28)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-10-27

Total views
117 ( #42,442 of 64,121 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
35 ( #21,638 of 64,121 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.