The Stoics on Hypotheses and Hypothetical Arguments

Phronesis 42 (3):299-312 (1997)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
ABSTRACT: In this paper I argue (i) that the hypothetical arguments about which the Stoic Chrysippus wrote numerous books (DL 7.196) are not to be confused with the so-called hypothetical syllogisms" but are the same hypothetical arguments as those mentioned five times in Epictetus (e.g. Diss. 1.25.11-12); and (ii) that these hypothetical arguments are formed by replacing in a non-hypothetical argument one (or more) of the premisses by a Stoic "hypothesis" or supposition. Such "hypotheses" or suppositions differ from propositions in that they have a specific logical form and no truth-value. The reason for the introduction of a distinct class of hypothetical arguments can be found in the context of dialectical argumentation. The paper concludes with the discussion of some evidence for the use of Stoic hypothetical arguments in ancient texts.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BOBTSO-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-09-21
View other versions
Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
540 (#14,364)

6 months
19 (#42,680)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?