Filling the Gaps in Hume’s Vacuums

Hume Studies 38 (1):79-99 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The paper addresses two difficulties that arise in Treatise 1.2.5. First, Hume appears to be inconsistent when he denies that we have an idea of a vacuum or empty space yet allows for the idea of an “invisible and intangible distance.” My solution to this difficulty is to develop the overlooked possibility that Hume does not take the invisible and intangible distance to be a distance at all. Second, although Hume denies that we have an idea of a vacuum, some texts in Treatise 1.2.5 are taken by interpreters to suggest that Hume nonetheless believes that there are vacuums in nature. I discuss the relevant texts and defend the view that Hume does not in fact countenance belief in vacuums. I conclude by outlining an interpretation of Hume’s intention in the Treatise that allows us to understand his discussion of ideas as having implications for the sciences.
ISBN(s)
0319-7336
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BOEQTG
Upload history
Archival date: 2014-09-05
View other versions
Added to PP index
2013-09-04

Total views
640 ( #8,062 of 2,432,432 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
62 ( #11,535 of 2,432,432 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.