From Hume's Dictum Via Submergence to Composition as Identity or Mereological Nihilism

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 95 (1):336-355 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
I show that a particular version of Hume's Dictum together with the falsity of Composition as Identity entails an incoherency, so either that version of Hume's Dictum is false or Composition as Identity is true. I conditionally defend the particular version of Hume's Dictum in play, and hence conditionally conclude that Composition as Identity is true. I end by suggesting an alternative way out for a persistent foe of Composition as Identity, namely mereological nihilism.
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2013-06-25
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Emergence.Humphreys, Paul
Parts of Classes.Lewis, David K.
Objects and Persons.Merricks, Trenton

View all 51 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
What is an Ersatz Part?Miller, Kristie & Hariman, Johann

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
436 ( #9,515 of 49,009 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
45 ( #15,007 of 49,009 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.