The Pragmatics of Slurs

Noûs 51 (3):439-462 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
I argue that the offense generation pattern of slurring terms parallels that of impoliteness behaviors, and is best explained by appeal to similar purely pragmatic mechanisms. In choosing to use a slurring term rather than its neutral counterpart, the speaker signals that she endorses the term. Such an endorsement warrants offense, and consequently slurs generate offense whenever a speaker's use demonstrates a contrastive preference for the slurring term. Since this explanation comes at low theoretical cost and imposes few constraints on an account of the semantics of slurs, this suggests that we should not require semantic accounts to provide an independent explanation of the offense profile.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-02-13
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts.Bach, Kent & Harnish, Robert M.
Slurring Words.Anderson, Luvell & Lepore, Ernie

View all 39 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Slurs and Register: A Case Study in Meaning Pluralism.Diaz‐Legaspe, Justina; Liu, Chang & Stainton, Robert J.
The Social Life of Slurs.Nunberg, Geoffrey
Slurs, Roles and Power.Popa-Wyatt, Mihaela & Wyatt, Jeremy L.

View all 25 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
1,158 ( #2,426 of 50,164 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
105 ( #4,653 of 50,164 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.