The Pragmatics of Slurs

Noûs 51 (3):439-462 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
I argue that the offense generation pattern of slurring terms parallels that of impoliteness behaviors, and is best explained by appeal to similar purely pragmatic mechanisms. In choosing to use a slurring term rather than its neutral counterpart, the speaker signals that she endorses the term. Such an endorsement warrants offense, and consequently slurs generate offense whenever a speaker's use demonstrates a contrastive preference for the slurring term. Since this explanation comes at low theoretical cost and imposes few constraints on an account of the semantics of slurs, this suggests that we should not require semantic accounts to provide an independent explanation of the offense profile.
Reprint years
2017
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BOLTPO-9
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-02-13
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts.Bach, Kent & Harnish, Robert M.
Slurring Words.Anderson, Luvell & Lepore, Ernie

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Slurs, Roles and Power.Popa-Wyatt, Mihaela & Wyatt, Jeremy L.
The Social Life of Slurs.Nunberg, Geoffrey

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-02-14

Total downloads
784 ( #2,126 of 37,191 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
107 ( #2,950 of 37,191 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.