Should I stay or should I go? Three-year-olds’ reactions to appropriate motives to interrupt a joint activity

PLoS ONE 18 (7):e0288401 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Understanding when it is acceptable to interrupt a joint activity is an important part of understanding what cooperation entails. Philosophical analyses have suggested that we should release our partner from a joint activity anytime the activity conflicts with fulfilling a moral obligation. To probe young children’s understanding of this aspect, we investigated whether 3-year-old children (N = 60) are sensitive to the legitimacy of motives (selfish condition vs. moral condition) leading agents to intentionally interrupt their joint activity. We measured whether children protested or released their partner by scoring their reactions. Our results indicate that children did not manifest different reactions when the motive behind their partner leaving was moral than when the motive was selfish. However, our data showed a stable pattern: regardless of the partner’s motives, some 3-year-olds take initiatives to release their partners from joint activity, suggesting that measuring release is a valuable tool for investigating joint action.

Author Profiles

John Michael
Aarhus University
Francesca Bonalumi
Technische Universität München

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-09-30

Downloads
169 (#86,912)

6 months
86 (#74,087)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?