Operationalizing Consciousness: Subjective Report and Task Performance

Philosophy of Science 80 (5):1031-1041 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
There are two distinct but related threads in this article. The first is methodological and is aimed at exploring the relative merits and faults of different operational definitions of consciousness. The second is conceptual and is aimed at understanding the prior commitments regarding the nature of conscious content that motivate these positions. I consider two distinct operationalizations: one defines consciousness in terms of dichotomous subjective reports, the other in terms of graded subjective reports. I ultimately argue that both approaches are inadequate and that a third alternative that involves integration of subjective report and task performance should be adopted
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2014-02-03
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Measuring Consciousness: Is One Measure Better Than the Other?Sandberg, Kristian; Timmermans, Bert; Overgaard, Morten & Cleeremans, Axel
Is Conscious Perception Gradual or Dichotomous? A Comparison of Report Methodologies During a Visual Task.Overgaard, Morten; Rote, Julian; Mouridsen, Kim & Ramsøy, Thomas Zoëga
Introspection and Subliminal Perception.Ramsøy, Thomas Zoega & Overgaard, Morten

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
170 ( #18,049 of 41,508 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #28,337 of 41,508 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.