Defending the Martian Argument

Disputatio 1 (20):1 - 9 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Chomskian holds that the grammars that linguists produce are about human psycholinguistic structures, i.e. our mastery of a grammar, our linguistic competence. But if we encountered Martians whose psycholinguistic processes differed from ours, but who nevertheless produced sentences that are extensionally equivalent to the set of sentences in our English and shared our judgements on the grammaticality of various English sentences, then we would count them as being competent in English. A grammar of English is about what the Martians and we share. In this note, I argue that a recent attack on the Martian Argument by Laurence fail to mitigate its force.

Author's Profile

Steffen Borge
Nord University

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-10-10

Downloads
705 (#19,043)

6 months
66 (#58,547)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?