Reconciling the Principled Approach to Hearsay with the Rule of Law

Supreme Court Law Review 65 (2d):145-168 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
My goal in this paper is to argue that the principled approach to hearsay is consistent with the rule of law. I begin by contrasting an instrumental conception of the rule of law with a conception that views the rule of law in primarily normative terms. I then turn my attention to a recent criticism of the Supreme Court of Canada’s principled approach to hearsay and suggest that if Michael Oakeshott’s normative interpretation of the rule of law is adopted, there is no tension between the principled approach to hearsay and the rule of law.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BOTRTP
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-09-03
View other versions
Added to PP index
2013-08-28

Total views
220 ( #21,396 of 53,051 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #26,274 of 53,051 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.