The crime-preventive impact of penal sanctions

In Peter Cane & Herbert M. Kritzer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research. Oxford University Press (2010)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This article opens with the consequentialist–deontologist debate, with the former concerned about the relevance of punitive measures against their crime reducing potentials, while the latter highlights punishment as censure of wrongful acts and the proportion of the punishment to the degree of crime. The article briefly discusses the empirical research on the impact of penal sanctions and focuses on three main kinds of empirical research into possible general deterrent effects—namely, association studies, quasi-experimental studies, and contextual and perceptual studies. It addresses the methodological issues involved in deterrence research and summarizes the results precisely. This article also discusses reductivism in the view of the possibility that penal sanctions could influence the offender's will. The results suggest that crime preventive aims can justify sentencing policies only to a limited degree, at least for the foreseeable future.
No keywords specified (fix it)
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-09-11
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
194 ( #28,698 of 2,433,543 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #49,367 of 2,433,543 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.