Quantum leaps in philosophy of mind

Journal of Consciousness Studies 11 (12):17--42 (2004)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
I discuss the quantum mechanical theory of consciousness and freewill offered by Stapp (1993, 1995, 2000, 2004). First I show that decoherence-based arguments do not work against this theory. Then discuss a number of problems with the theory: Stapp's separate accounts of consciousness and freewill are incompatible, the interpretations of QM they are tied to are questionable, the Zeno effect could not enable freewill as he suggests because weakness of will would then be ubiquitous, and the holism of measurement in QM is not a good explanation of the unity of consciousness for essentially the same reason that local interactions may seem incapable of accounting for it.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2008-06-06
Latest version: 10 (2015-01-30)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Consciousness Explained.DENNETT, Daniel C.
Do We Have Free Will?Libet, Benjamin W.

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
616 ( #4,422 of 42,948 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #25,748 of 42,948 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.