Child euthanasia: should we just not talk about it?

Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (8):630-634 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Belgium has recently extended its euthanasia legislation to minors, making it the first legislation in the world that does not specify any age limit. I consider two strands in the opposition to this legislation. First, I identify five arguments in the public debate to the effect that euthanasia for minors is somehow worse than euthanasia for adults—viz. arguments from weightiness, capability of discernment, pressure, sensitivity and sufficient palliative care—and show that these arguments are wanting. Second, there is another position in the public debate that wishes to keep the current age restriction on the books and have ethics boards exercise discretion in euthanasia decisions for minors. I interpret this position on the background of Velleman’s “Against the Right to Die” and show that, although costs remain substantial, it actually can provide some qualified support against extending euthanasia legislation to minors
Keywords
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BOVCES
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-07-13
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-02-28

Total views
193 ( #14,913 of 39,608 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
72 ( #5,954 of 39,608 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.