The semantic insignificance of referential intentions

Grazer Philosophische Studien 62 (1):125-135 (2001)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
It is argued that none of the speaker's referential intentions accompanying his utterance of a demonstrative are semantically significant but rather the associated demonstration (or some other source of salience). It is constitutive of the speaker's having the specifically referential intention - held by Kent Bach to be semantically significant - that the speaker is taking, and relying upon, his accompanying gesture (or some other source of salience) as semantically significant, making it the case that this intention is not even partly semantically significant. The same is then shown to hold for the speaker's remaining referential intentions: his intention aimed at a perceived object, believed by David Kaplan to be semantically significant, as well as the intention to refer to the object that he has in mind.
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2017-02-10
Latest version: 2 (2017-02-10)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
127 ( #19,521 of 38,850 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #35,849 of 38,850 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.