A priori causal laws

Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 60 (4):358-370 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Sober and Elgin defend the claim that there are a priori causal laws in biology. Lange and Rosenberg take issue with this on Humean grounds, among others. I will argue that Sober and Elgin don’t go far enough – there are a priori causal laws in many sciences. Furthermore, I will argue that this thesis is compatible with a Humean metaphysics and an empiricist epistemology.

Author's Profile

Darren Bradley
University of Leeds


Added to PP

331 (#43,969)

6 months
61 (#62,291)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?