Conditionalization and Belief De Se

Dialectica 64 (2):247-250 (2010)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Colin Howson (1995 ) offers a counter-example to the rule of conditionalization. I will argue that the counter-example doesn't hit its target. The problem is that Howson mis-describes the total evidence the agent has. In particular, Howson overlooks how the restriction that the agent learn 'E and nothing else' interacts with the de se evidence 'I have learnt E'.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BRACAB
Revision history
Archival date: 2013-06-25
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2010-07-02

Total views
257 ( #11,408 of 39,633 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #29,443 of 39,633 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.