Surface and Deep Interpretation

In Mark Rollins (ed.), Danto and His Critics, 2nd Edition. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 69-83 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Arthur C. Danto proposes a complex and controversial relationship between surface and deep interpretations in The Philosophical Disenfranchisement of Art (1986). We detail the analogy between understanding human actions and interpreting works of art that both develops a motivation for Danto's view and clarifies it. We object to the most plausible version of content dependency among surface and deep interpretations and in so doing, we also clarify the way in which an interpretation is constitutive of an artwork.
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BRASAD-10
Revision history
First archival date: 2017-08-06
Latest version: 2 (2017-08-07)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Surface Interpretation: Reply to Leddy.Peg Zeglin Brand & Myles Brand - 1999 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 57 (4):463-465.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-07-29

Total views
251 ( #12,471 of 40,634 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
113 ( #3,796 of 40,634 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.