Singular propositions and modes of presentation

Disputatio (1):05-21 (1996)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to survey a number of features which are constitutive of the Millian account of attitude-ascription and which I take to be irremediably defective. The features in question, some of which have not been fully appreciated, relate mainly to the failure of that account to accommodate certain fundamental aspects of our ordinary practise of attitude attribution. I take it that one’s definitive method of assessment of a given semantical theory consists in checking out whether or not the theory is able to accommodate our pre-theoretical linguistic intuitions; to use Keith Donnellan’s phrase, such intuitions are the bottom line in philosophical argumentation about language. And I argue that the Millian appeal to modes of presentation taken both as semantically irrelevant and external to the singular contents believed, known, etc., as well as the associated pragmatic strategy employed to discard our ground-floor judgements, are insufficient to palliate the manifest implausibility of a number of Millian descriptions of our attitudes, especially descriptions of our second-order attitudes.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years
1996
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BRASPA-3
Revision history
Archival date: 2014-02-25
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Underprivileged Access.Baker, Lynne Rudder

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2014-02-20

Total views
80 ( #24,321 of 38,058 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #36,732 of 38,058 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.