Unknown pleasures

Philosophical Studies 177 (5):1333-1344 (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
According to attitudinal theories of pleasure and pain, what makes a given sensation count as a pleasure or a pain is just the attitudes of the experiencing agent toward it. In a previous article, I objected to such theories on the grounds that they cannot account for pleasures and pains whose subjects are entirely unaware of them at the time of experience. Recently, Chris Heathwood and Fred Feldman, the two leading contemporary defenders of attitudinal theories, have responded to this objection, in very different ways. In this paper, I reconstruct and evaluate these responses. My conclusion is that neither response succeeds.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BRAUP
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-10-06
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-02-27

Total views
116 ( #42,570 of 64,082 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
47 ( #16,391 of 64,082 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.