When betting odds and credences come apart : more worries for Dutch book arguments

Analysis 66 (2) (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

If an agent believes that the probability of E being true is 1/2, should she accept a bet on E at even odds or better? Yes, but only given certain conditions. This paper is about what those conditions are. In particular, we think that there is a condition that has been overlooked so far in the literature. We discovered it in response to a paper by Hitchcock (2004) in which he argues for the 1/3 answer to the Sleeping Beauty problem. Hitchcock argues that this credence follows from calculating her fair betting odds, plus the assumption that Sleeping Beauty’s credences should track her fair betting odds. We will show that this last assumption is false. Sleeping Beauty’s credences should not follow her fair betting odds due to a peculiar feature of her epistemic situation.

Author Profiles

Darren Bradley
University of Leeds
Hannes Leitgeb
Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-12-04

Downloads
21 (#92,695)

6 months
21 (#90,756)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?