Another look at the two visual systems hypothesis: The argument from illusion studies

Journal of Consciousness Studies 15 (8):35-62 (2008)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The purpose of this paper is to defend what I call the action-oriented coding theory (ACT) of spatially contentful visual experience. Integral to ACT is the view that conscious visual experience and visually guided action make use of a common subject-relative or 'egocentric' frame of reference. Proponents of the influential two visual systems hypothesis (TVSH), however, have maintained on empirical grounds that this view is false (Milner & Goodale, 1995/2006; Clark, 1999; 2001; Campbell, 2002; Jacob & Jeannerod, 2003; Goodale & Milner, 2004). One main source of evidence for TVSH comes from behavioral studies of the comparative effects of size-contrast illusions on visual awareness and visuo- motor action. This paper shows that not only is the evidence from illusion studies inconclusive, there is a better, ACT-friendly interpretation of the evidence that avoids serious theoretical difficulties faced by TVSH.
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2014-08-25
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Conscious Vision in Action.Robert Briscoe & John Schwenkler - 2015 - Cognitive Science 39 (7):1435-1467.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
475 ( #7,452 of 45,690 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
69 ( #10,125 of 45,690 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.