Bodily Action and Distal Attribution in Sensory Substitution

In Fiona Macpherson (ed.), Sensory Substitution and Augmentation. Proceedings of the British Academy (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
According to proponents of the sensorimotor contingency theory of perception (Hurley & Noë 2003, Noë 2004, O’Regan 2011), active control of camera movement is necessary for the emergence of distal attribution in tactile-visual sensory substitution (TVSS) because it enables the subject to acquire knowledge of the way stimulation in the substituting modality varies as a function of self-initiated, bodily action. This chapter, by contrast, approaches distal attribution as a solution to a causal inference problem faced by the subject’s perceptual systems. Given all of the available endogenous and exogenous evidence available to those systems, what is the most probable source of stimulation in the substituting modality? From this perspective, active control over the camera’s movements matters for rather different reasons. Most importantly, it generates proprioceptive and efference-copy based information about the camera’s body-relative position necessary to make use of the spatial cues present in the stimulation that the subject receives for purposes of egocentric object localization.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BRIBAA
Revision history
First archival date: 2013-10-02
Latest version: 3 (2015-09-15)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Spatial Content and Motoric Significance.Robert Briscoe - 2014 - Avant: Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies (2):199-216.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-10-02

Total views
571 ( #4,586 of 41,573 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
40 ( #15,712 of 41,573 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.