Epistemic Dispositions: Reply to Turri and Bronner

Logos and Episteme 3 (4):629-636 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX


We reply to recent papers by John Turri and Ben Bronner, who criticise the dispositionalised Nozickian tracking account we discuss in “Mad, Bad and Dangerous to Know.” We argue that the account we suggested can handle the problems raised by Turri and Bronner. In the course of responding to Turri and Bronner’s objections, we draw three general lessons for theories of epistemic dispositions: that epistemic dispositions are to some extent extrinsic, that epistemic dispositions can have manifestation conditions concerning circumstances where their bearers fail to exist, and that contrast is relevant to disposition attributions

Author Profiles

Rachael Briggs
Australian National University
Daniel Nolan
University of Notre Dame


Added to PP

1,588 (#6,603)

6 months
122 (#36,057)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?