On Context Shifters and Compositionality in Natural Languages

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
My modest aim in this paper is to prove certain relations between some type of hyper-intensional operators, namely context shifting operators, and compositionality in natural languages. Various authors (e.g. von Fintel & Matthewson 2008; Stalnaker 2014) have argued that context-shifting operators are incompatible with compositionality. In fact, some of them understand Kaplan’s (1989) famous ban on context-shifting operators as a constraint on compositionality. Others, (e.g. Rabern 2013) take contextshifting operators to be compatible with compositionality but, unfortunately, do not provide a proof, or an argument in favor of their position. The aim of this paper is to do precisely that. Additionally, I provide a new proof that compositionality for propositional content (intension) is a proper generalization of compositionality for character (hyper-intensions).
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BRIOCS-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-09-06
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics and Epistemology of Demonstratives and Other Indexicals.David Kaplan - 1989 - In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan. Oxford University Press. pp. 481-563.
A Plea for Monsters.Schlenker, Philippe
Context.Stalnaker, Robert

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-09-06

Total views
25 ( #36,479 of 39,984 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #29,108 of 39,984 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.