The Elusive Experience of Agency

Topics in Cognitive Science 3 (2):262-267 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
I here present some doubts about whether Mandik’s (2010) proposed intermediacy and recurrence constraints are necessary and sufficient for agentive experience. I also argue that in order to vindicate the conclusion that agentive experience is an exclusively perceptual phenomenon (Prinz, 2007), it is not enough to show that the predictions produced by forward models of planned motor actions are conveyed by mock sensory signals. Rather, it must also be shown that the outputs of “comparator” mechanisms that compare these predictions against actual sensory feedback are also coded in a perceptual representational format.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2010-12-13
Latest version: 3 (2015-09-30)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
888 ( #5,796 of 64,109 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #30,282 of 64,109 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.