The Real Truth About the Unreal Future

In Karen Bennett & Dean Zimmerman (eds.), Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, volume 7 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Growing-Block theorists hold that past and present things are real, while future things do not yet exist. This generates a puzzle: how can Growing-Block theorists explain the fact that some sentences about the future appear to be true? Briggs and Forbes develop a modal ersatzist framework, on which the concrete actual world is associated with a branching-time structure of ersatz possible worlds. They then show how this branching structure might be used to determine the truth values of future contingents. They point out three different ways of interpreting the logical connectives, which give rise to three different logics of the open future: one supervaluationist, one corresponding to Lukasiewicz's strong Kleene logic, and one intuitionist.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BRITRT-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2013-01-11
View other versions
Added to PP index
2013-01-11

Total views
858 ( #6,105 of 64,146 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
58 ( #12,688 of 64,146 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.